Jul
20
2010
Posted by
admin
Comments

Colombia Shows Proof of FARC Rebels in Venezuela; Chavez Scoffs

This article was originally posted by The Latin America Herald Tribune

Colombia is considering accusing Venezuela before international organizations over the alleged presence of rebel chiefs in Venezuelan soil, a presence Bogota says is proven by data it shared with media outlets but ordered them not to disseminate

BOGOTA – Colombia said on Friday it is considering accusing Venezuela before international organizations over the alleged presence of Colombian rebel chiefs in that neighboring country, a presence Bogota says is proven by data it shared with media outlets but ordered them not to disseminate.

“For six years the Colombian government sustained a patient dialogue with the Venezuelan government, on various occasions providing it information on the location of terrorists in that territory,” Colombian President Alvaro Uribe’s office said in a brief statement.

“All was for naught with respect to terrorist leaders. We must once again consider taking the matter to international authorities,” the text added.

It also said Bogota “has had information about the presence of terrorists in Venezuela” since the capture in late 2004 of FARC “foreign minister” Rodrigo Granda, who was snatched by bounty hunters on Venezuelan soil and subsequently taken across the border.

Granda was jailed in Colombia but subsequently released in 2007 as part of efforts to secure the release of hostages.

Colombia, the United States and the European Union have designated the FARC as a terrorist organization. The majority of Latin American nations are unwilling to hang that label on the guerrillas.

In March 2008, Colombian denounced before the United Nations and the Organization of American States alleged “accords” between the FARC and the governments of Ecuador and Venezuela.

The Uribe administration on Thursday presented the directors of several Colombian media outlets with evidence that allegedly proves that top leaders of the FARC and the smaller ELN group are hiding in Venezuela, but it said that for security reasons it did not authorize them to disseminate the information.

Defense Minister Gabriel Silva told a press conference that in his private meeting with the journalists he showed them photographs and video footage and provided co-ordinates that allegedly prove the “confirmed, clear and concrete (presence) of FARC and ELN terrorists in the neighboring country.”

Silva said that the government’s purpose in providing the information was to show “that the deterioration in relations between Colombia and Venezuela” was due to its neighbor’s “tolerance of the presence of those terrorists” in its territory.

The United States also chimed in, when US State Department Spokesman P.J. Crowley was asked about the reports.

“Well, we’ve – we are examining those reports,” said Crowley. “Some of this is not new in the sense that there have been concerns for some time of cross-border interaction involvement in insurgent activities or terrorist activities within Colombia. Venezuela is obliged, as a member of the United Nations, the OAS, and UNASUR, to deny terrorist groups the ability to operate within its territory. We’ve been concerned about this for some time and it’s one of the reasons why, since 2006, Venezuela has been judged not to be fully cooperating on antiterrorism efforts.”

In its initial public reaction, the Venezuelan Foreign Ministry said in a statement Friday that the charges represent a “new effort to destroy (bilateral) relations.”

“The pathetic media show on Thursday was a desperate attempt to damage a possible normalization of bilateral relations, in which the intrigue of the U.S. Embassy in Bogota, whose ambassador was consulted by the defense minister before offering his press conference, has not been absent,” the Venezuelan Foreign Ministry said.

Destroying bilateral relations has turned into a “sickly obsession” of Uribe, who will leave office next month after two four-year terms.

The ministry added that “every time that the Colombian government has provided information about the alleged presence of irregular Colombian groups in Venezuelan territory, the Venezuelan government has carried out the necessary verifications and systematically confirmed the falseness of such information.”

The statement also said that Venezuela, along with other neighboring countries, has consistently maintained that it “will strongly act with the full weight of the law and law-enforcement agencies if there is a possibility of irregular groups on the vast border with Colombia.”

The ministry said it hopes that the new government of President-elect Juan Manuel Santos, a conservative who previously served as Uribe’s defense minister, “gives high priority to a proposal of a peace plan for Colombia, which would allow South America to accompany the implementation of a solution that addresses the root causes of the armed conflict affecting our brother country.”

Shortly after the statement was issued, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro announced he ordered his country’s envoy to Colombia to return to Caracas for consultations.

“We’ve called Ambassador Gustavo Marquez for consultations in Caracas so he can join the evaluation of a series of political and diplomatic measures that will be taken in the coming hours (in response to) the Colombian government’s aggression,” he told a press conference.

The Colombian government’s decision not to publicly divulge the purported evidence of FARC and ELN presence in Venezuela – after announcing having shared the information with the media – surprised observers in Bogota.

Those analysts said Friday that the information is not new and questioned the government for re-divulging it at this time, amid efforts by President-elect Santos to improve relations with Colombia’s leftist-led neighbor.

A former president of Colombia, Ernesto Samper, told Caracol Radio that he is worried about attempts to “obstruct” the attempt to mend fences with Venezuela.

Relations between Colombia, the United States’ closest ally in Latin America, and socialist Venezuela have soured on several occasions in recent years.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez froze relations with Colombia a year ago over Bogota’s allegations that anti-tank weapons made in Sweden and sold to Venezuela in the 1980s had turned up in the hands of the FARC.

Tensions worsened with the signing in October 2009 of a military agreement that gave U.S. troops greater access to at least seven Colombian military bases.

 
 
Jul
6
2010
Posted by
admin
Comments

Venezuela is an ‘Animal Farm’ thanks to Chavez

animal farm 300x208 Venezuela is an Animal Farm thanks to ChavezThis blog was originally posted by the Huffington Post.

Last May, a private farm amidst Venezuela’s rolling green countryside was expropriated by the country’s president, Hugo Chavez. As Chavez later described, the farm’s owner “is out there crying and saying he is going to get his land back. Well, he’ll have to topple Chavez to get this back, because that farm belongs to the revolution now.”

The farm’s owner is Diego Arria. While Chavez has labeled Arria an “unburied corpse” of Venezuela’s past, Arria has hardly been a lifeless corpse.

Seventy-year-old Arria has served as Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations, Venezuelan ambassador to the United Nations, and as a personal advisor to former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan.

Arria captured the world’s attention when, as president of the U.N. Security Council, he condemned the failure of the international community to act against Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic for his brutal treatment of Bosnian Muslims. He was a star witness during the prosecution of Milosevic for the genocide at Srebrenica. Prior to his UN tenure, Arria had been a leading political figure in Venezuela, serving as governor of the capital Caracas in the 1970s.

In 1988, Arria purchased the farm – named “La Carolina” in memory of his deceased daughter – for $300,000. The property was then in ruins. Arria renovated and restored the property, developing it into a farm complete with an organic coffee plantation and grass-fed cows producing 600 gallons of milk daily.

Under the pretext of confiscating “unused land,” Venezuela’s National Land Institute stormed onto the property on May 1 with a platoon of soldiers. The uniformed men raided the farmhouse at gunpoint. They took Arria’s clothing and even his horse-riding boots as trophies.

Thirty-eight families depended on La Carolina for their livelihoods. They were told to find employment elsewhere. The cows, which Chávez claimed on television were “starving,” were given away as gifts. One of them ended up on a barbeque spit, cooked for President Chavez himself. I contacted a former employee at La Carolina who told me that the farm’s horses were slaughtered and sold as “beef.” The seizure of Arria’s farm and the plundering of his property has nothing to do with Venezuelan law or “reclaiming unused land.” In fact, the Venezuelan government is the largest landowner in the country and most of its holdings lie unused.

I feel partially responsible for Arria’s current predicament. I extended an invitation to him in April to speak at the Oslo Freedom Forum, a human rights conference in Norway that this year included Lech Walesa, Rebiya Kadeer, Anwar Ibrahim, and Garry Kasparov.

It was Arria’s participation in this conference that compelled him to speak out against Chavez’s human rights violations. Arria had told media covering the event that Chavez would one day face international justice for his crimes against the Venezuelan people. The reaction of the Chavez government to Arria’s statements was swift and implacable.

This expropriation was punishment for Arria’s criticism of Chávez. Chavez even presented photos of the farm on Venezuelan state television. He gloated that “It looked like Falcon Crest” comparing Arria’s farm to the winery estate featured on the American television show from the 1980s and underlined the presence of a swimming pool was a sign of its “bourgeois” nature. This sort of comment seeks only to sow resentment in the minds of those who believe inequalities of wealth represent an injustice that requires correction through theft.

The epic irony is that Chávez’s own family started with little wealth when he became president in 1999. His father and brothers now own extensive landholdings in the Venezuelan state of Barinas. They have acquired so much ill-gotten wealth – and display it with so much ostentation and vulgarity – that various European media outlets have called the Chavez’s “Venezuela’s Royal Family.” A rarely reported story was the internal fallout among Chavez’s cronies, when Stanford Bank collapsed amidst fraud so did several billion dollars worth of funds ransacked from the Venezuelan treasury.

Despite the new wealth for the Chavez family and Venezuela’s governing clique, the country suffers from elevated amounts of “critical” poverty and is currently one of the most violent countries in the world. Venezuela’s economy is in ruins, but Chavez continues to fund various international controversial projects. He provides support for the FARC terrorist army in Colombia (which recently includes the public revelation that he has kept them well-stocked with Swedish missiles purchased by Venezuela). He was also recently exposed in Spain as having facilitated training for Basque ETA terrorists in FARC camps. His penchant for villains and rogues extends to alliances with Belarus, Iran, Libya, Syria, Zimbabwe, and especially Cuba. Chavez also continues to send billions of petrodollars in aid to prop up the governments of Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador, and Nicaragua – all despite the desperate needs of many of Venezuela’s own citizens.

Since 2006, Venezuela has carried out more than 800 expropriations across industries and involving all sorts of property: farms, radio stations, television studios, factories, private residences, banks, butcher shops, sandwich shops, steel mills and, most probably in the near future, the main Venezuelan beer company. There is a clear intention to terrorize a population with the fear of being expropriated in case of dissent or criticism of the government. From a legal perspective, there is an intention to replace jurisprudence surrounding the concept of private property with the term “social property” meaning: it belongs to everyone but will be controlled by the state.

Despite facing the wrath of Chavez, Diego Arria will not give up. He spent the month of May visiting government officials and organizations across Europe, discussing the seizure of his farm and denouncing the Chavez government. Upon realizing the lethargy and ignorance in the international arena about the abuses committed by the Chavez government, Arria has become the most eloquent and tenacious spokesman for those affected by the expropriation abuse. In June he met with the Council of Europe, the International Labor Organization (ILO) in Geneva, the Spanish parliament, and even the International Criminal Court at the Hague. As a result of Arria’s efforts, Chavez ordered another one of Arria’s properties seized in mid-June: a 90 acre orange orchard. Once again the employees were kicked off the land. Undaunted, Arria’s one-man effort continues and this month he will be visiting Canada, México, Colombia, Chile and Brazil.

In order for world opinion to mobilize against Chavez, he must be revealed as the petty authoritarian and enemy of individual rights that he is. This is a far more accurate view than the heroic champion of the poor and enemy of capitalism and Yankee imperialism as his apologists (most recently Oliver Stone) have tried to disguise him. Venezuela has lived under 11 years of Chavez. He has declared that he will rule until 2030. What will become of Venezuela in the next twenty years?

Despite an attachment to his farm La Carolina, Arria told me that he is willing under one condition to give up his farm to Chavez. That is, “so he can retire there now – provided that he gives us Venezuelans our country and our peace back.”

 
Jun
22
2010
Posted by
admin
Comments

National Guard “inspect” farm of former UN Embassador Diego Arria

Officials of the National Lands Institute (Inti) and the National Guard appeared in the Los Azahares, a farm located in Yaracuy state and property of former Permanent Representative of Venezuela to the United Nations Diego Arria.

The authorities would enforce land recovery for presumed wastelands. Robert Herrera, the individual responsible for the farm, told El Universal, that the Inti officials ranked the productivity of the plots of land, “without making any prior study.” They inspected the lands, the machinery and the house. Are they getting ready to expropriate Arria’s property?