Apr
3
2012
Posted by
admin
Comments

The “Great Housing Mission,” Or The Great Hotel Hijack?

In 2010 and 2011, 140,000 Venezuelans were left homeless by severe flooding. Many of these families were stranded by the natural disasters, refugees in their own country.

Just as any community would pull together in the wake of tragedy, many Venezuelans who hadn’t lost their homes came to the aid of their countrymen, offering them shelter and support. So, fifteen months ago, when the Chávez government “respectfully” asked the hotels of Anzoategui state to allow refugees to stay for free under their roofs for two weeks until the government could find a suitable solution, the owners of those hotels patriotically obliged.

However, two weeks quickly turned into fifteen months and at present, the hotels are still being forced to shelter the refugees. Hotel owners have not been compensated and, with little noteworthy progress made toward finding a permanent home for the refugees, there is no end in sight to the government’s hijacking of their property.

cmimg 53759 The “Great Housing Mission,” Or The Great Hotel Hijack?

It’s only the latest offense committed in the name of Chávez’s so-called “Great Housing Mission,” under which Chávez recently promised to build 200,000 new homes. And while the government continues to seize private property in order to build the homes, the housing itself has yet to materialize, leaving many stripped of their private property and even more without a home. For instance, after the flooding, Calogero Alotto lost his mechanic shop and parking lot to the government. Today, the promised houses do not exist on his property and he is still waiting to get paid.

“I worked for 42 hard years to build my business and it didn’t count for anything,” said Alotto, 57. “I’ve been left without property and without a job. I’ve had to sell two trucks just to keep surviving.”

While many would rightly point out that these stories typify the Chávez administration’s disrespect for property rights, the more important lesson is that his policies have made this a losing situation for all parties involved.

The hotel owners, even after 15 months, must continue to provide uncompensated housing for droves of flood victims, which not only hurts the hotel’s bottom line but also damages the local economy, as paying customers remain unable to secure the rooms held down by the refugees. What’s more, the policies have hurt the refugeesthemselves who, thanks to the lackluster results of Chávez’s program, remain homeless nearly a year and a half after a natural disaster destroyed their houses. And many of the displaced haven’t been lucky enough to receive shelter in a hotel. These families live in constant uncertainty, spending their nights in car-parks and warehouses, waiting for their government to take action.

 
Mar
30
2012
Posted by
admin
Comments

Chavez Threatens To Nationalize Banks That Support His Political Opponents

hugo chávez Chavez Threatens To Nationalize Banks That Support His Political Opponents

In the past, What’s Next has reported on previous threats by the Chávez administration to nationalize companies that do not acquiesce to his demands. One of his most common targets has been banks. Just last January, he vowed to expropriate banks that refused to aid a government agricultural program. A pugnacious Chávez called one bank’s president and threatened to nationalize his company “whenever I want.” In May 2011, Chávez expropriated lots, parcels and apartments belonging to banks under the control of Fogade, the national Deposits Guarantee and Bank Protection Fund.

Now, the cancer-stricken Chávez is far less lively, but equally keen on continuing his economically-damaging policy of expropriations. This time, however, his target is not companies who refuse to go along with his government policies, but those who he perceives as supporting “the opposition.”

“I have a list of private banks that are financing the opposition’s destabilizing plans,” said Chávez. “It wouldn’t be bad at all to issue a decree and bring those firms under state control. Large national and some international companies that earn more than enough money here.”

Aside from the fact that it’s oddly undemocratic to refer to one’s political opposition as “destabilizing,” Chávez has also proposed to ramp up the policies that continue to adversely impact his country’s economy. Price controls, expropriations and other policies have eroded Venezuela’s private sector as indicated by the 2012 Index of Economic Freedom, which ranked Venezuela’s economy 174 out of 179.

 
Feb
16
2012
Posted by
admin
Comments

ICYMI: Venezuela’s homeless call racetrack home

Despite housing pledges from Chavez, Venezuela’s homeless call racetrack home
The Washington Post
February 16, 2012
By Juan Forero

CARACAS, Venezuela – The chestnut-colored 3-year-olds still take the turns hard and fast on the dirt track at La Rinconada, the once-elegant racing park inaugurated in 1959 as Venezuela began its oil-fueled heyday.

But these days, dozens of homeless families live under the vast concrete grandstands, moved by President Hugo Chavez’s government into cramped cubicles to alleviate a critical housing shortage. Water service is spotty, foul-smelling bathrooms overflow with sewage and gangs of young thieves steal what little residents have.

“God takes care of us,” explained Maria Valera, 61, saying the weekend races she sees for free are the saving grace of living at the track.

For those trying to survive here – indeed, for thousands more in similar conditions across Venezuela’s capital – it is just another symbol of this city’s long slide into squalor, decay and fear. And that is a serious problem for a leftist populist government that is frantically trying to build housing ahead of an October presidential election in which Chavez will be challenged by a young, energetic opposition candidate, Henrique Capriles.

Even among the masses of destitute in this country – for 13 years the backbone for Chavez’s so-called people’s revolution – there is a tinge of despair that El Comandante has been unable to deliver on a long-held promise: housing.

Just 200 yards from where thoroughbreds rumble, Valera said she is opting to wait for Chavez to provide a new home. But she and her family – she says there are about 50 of them here counting extended relatives – have been waiting for more than 14 months, leaving some in despair.

“We are waiting for him to resolve things because we know he will give to us,” Valera said, as her grandchildren squealed and ran along darkened corridors. “He said that all of us who are here would go to our own apartment.”

It is an often-heard refrain across Caracas, a city of about 5 million. Tens of thousands of people such as Valera were made homeless by torrential rains in 2010 that flooded over the slap-dash neighborhoods where they lived. Those homeless families left harried government officials with little alternative than to move them into shelters, abandoned buildings, love motels and even tents near the presidential palace.

Shortage of materials

Venezuela already faced a housing shortage of 2 million units, the government’s own statistics show, the state only managing to build a third of the 100,000 new units needed each year.

Julio Borges, an opposition deputy in the National Assembly who frequently clashes with Chavez on housing issues, said governments that preceded Chavez’s built more housing. “And we think it is the government’s own policies that are contributing to this problem.”

Indeed, Chavez’s government has nationalized the country’s steel and cement industries, leading to shortages in building materials, while seeking construction know-how from allies such as Cuba that have a spotty record in alleviating housing shortages. The president’s frustration was plainly evident as he spoke on national television last week after a group of homeless families took to the streets to demand government action.

“Does one pull homes out of one’s sleeve?” Chavez said.

“These are counter-revolutionary actions,” he added, referring to the demonstrators. “They act like enemies of the government.”

In more guarded moments, though, the government and its maximum leader offer rosy forecasts and issue impressive statistics. There are programs such as the “Grand Housing Mission,” designed to build tens of thousands of new units, and “My Well-Equipped Home,” in which the government provides free or low-priced Chinese furnishings being imported at a cost of $1 billion.

In all, some 200,000 homes will be completed this year, Chavez claimed. Looking ahead to his own reelection to another six-year term, he predicted the end of the housing crisis by 2019. “There should not be one Venezuelan family that does not have a dignified, good and pretty home,” Chavez said.

To be sure, with the government’s oil-funded money machine in high gear, construction is taking place. One collection of new apartment blocks is going up on a hillside overlooking La Rinconada, winning several hundred supporters ahead of the October election.

“The one I am going to thank is the president of the republic,” said Hilda Rivero, 62, who lives in a new government apartment, having been moved from slum housing, known here as ranchos. “I had a rancho and my president took me out of there and gave me a dignified home.”

‘No one responds to us’

It is hard, though, to ignore the grim realities of a city that in the 1970s was the continent’s most modern but has since become its most violent and, in some ways, anarchic.

Vast slums cover hillsides while towering housing projects have the feel of some tropical version of the brutal futuristic city in “Blade Runner.”

Hundreds of families have for years occupied one uncompleted 45-story tower, even though many of the floors lack elevator service, running water or even walls and windows to protect children from tumbling to the streets below. A block away is a vast half-built shopping mall, the expropriation of which Chavez announced in a national address and which now houses hundreds of other families.

The hallways of the tower are dark and forbidding, but “you get used to it,” said Franci Coronado, 19, her two small children wriggling playfully at her side.

Across town at the horse racing track, several residents reeled off the downside of life there: the killing of a young man thrown from a grandstand, the harrowing birth of a baby in a cubicle separated by dry wall from other living spaces, old shower stalls covered in feces.

Residents said they are on government waiting lists for housing, and asked that their full names not be used for fear that they would be punished for talking to a reporter.

“It is terrible,” said one 30-something man named Pedro, who is raising a family here. “There is no safety, the food is sometimes terrible, and no one responds to us.”

Some like Maria Valera, though, went out of their way to avoid criticizing the president, saying she believed other officials were to blame.

“There has been no president like this president,” she said. “This one has helped poor people a lot, the people who do not have the way of getting a home, who have no way to buy an apartment.”

To read the full article on the Washington Post please click here.