Aug
26
2013
Posted by
admin
Comments

ICYMI: Chavez’s Inflation Bites His Successor

Wall Street Journal
August 25, 2013
By Mary O’Grady

OB YQ920 amcol0 G 20130825120857 e1377534741885 ICYMI: Chavez’s Inflation Bites His Successor

Courtesy of: European Pressphoto Agency

Hyperinflation and political witch hunts seem to go together. Just ask the Venezuelan opposition.

With the bolivar collapsing and prices spiraling higher, the government alleged this month that its No. 1 adversary, former presidential candidate Henrique Capriles, is linked to a prostitution ring that was using minors in the state of Miranda, where he is governor.

Lest that not be enough to turn Venezuela’s socially conservative working-classes against the popular Mr. Capriles, a leading congressman from the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) used gutter talk on the floor of the national assembly to accuse the governor of homosexuality.

Don’t suppose for a minute that this mudslinging is merely about destroying Mr. Capriles. The ruling chavistas, led by President Nicolás Maduro, need a circus because there is no bread—and that’s not a metaphor. At times in Venezuela, there really is no bread. Earlier this year there was, for a time, no toilet paper. Mr. Maduro knows he is in trouble.

The “proof” of the allegations against Mr. Capriles’s chief of staff, who is accused of running the sex ring, cannot be shown to the public, according to Mr. Maduro. He says that the “videos and photos” that the government confiscated in a raid are of “un-publishable orgies.” Venezuelans will have to use their imaginations while trusting the courts—now controlled by the military government—and the government itself to get to the bottom of it all. Developments will be reported on television, which is almost exclusively state-controlled and where most Venezuelans get their news.

Mr. Capriles has said that the allegations are an attempt to distract the population from the real problems in the country. The charges are certainly well timed. An official 46% devaluation in April took the bolivar-to-dollar exchange rate to 6.3 from 4.3. Those who actually need dollars are unlikely to get them at that rate. Instead they have to go to the black market, where one greenback costs as much as 38 bolivars, up from 22 in March.

The government forecasts that inflation will hit 40% this year. But Johns Hopkins University economist Steve Hanke, director of the Cato Institute’s Troubled Currency Project, says that the soaring cost for the bolivar in the market translates into an implied annual inflation rate of more than 250%.

Earlier this month Caracas-based economist José Manuel Puente described the perfect storm to the Los Angeles Times this way: “The slowdown in economic growth, high and persistent inflation and high levels of scarcities [of basic foodstuffs] will combine to make Venezuela’s the worst-performing economy on the continent, despite the extraordinary oil boom that the country is still benefiting from.”

A mid-July survey by the Venezuelan polling company IVAD, posted on the website lapatilla.com, suggests Mr. Maduro is having no luck dodging the blame like his predecessor Hugo Chávez did so deftly. Asked what are the principal problems facing the country, almost 82% of respondents named crime. More than 53% also pointed to shortages. The scarcity is caused by the price controls that the government is using to try to hold down inflation. Those controls could explain why only 31% named “the high cost of living.”

But more than 65% said the economic situation was worse or much worse than one year ago, and more than half blamed either the national government or Mr. Maduro for the country’s problems.

Because the allegations against Mr. Capriles by the PSUV included a pejorative term for a homosexual, gay-rights groups took offense. But Venezuela’s homosexuals needn’t feel special. Hate speech as a political tool has been common practice in Venezuela’s military government for more than a decade. Catholics, Jews, entrepreneurs and the bourgeoisie have all been on the receiving end.

Mr. Maduro, coached as he is by Fidel Castro, immediately recognized that gay rights are a priority for many members of the international left. So in the aftermath of the impolitic comments by his colleague in Congress, he quickly seized a gay-pride flag to wave while he continued his verbal assaults against Mr. Capriles.

Political nonconformists regularly singled out by chavista politicians for ridicule and acrimony won’t get off so easily. This week Mr. Maduro is expected to try again to force through congress an “enabling law” that will allow him to rule by decree.

Opposition Congressman Richard Mardo has already been stripped of his congressional immunity and is slated for trial on corruption charges. Other opponents are being investigated. The Venezuelan daily El Nacional reported this month that more than one third of congressional sessions in the first half of the year were spent “harassing the opposition,” including with physical violence.

The goal is to drum up mass hysteria against opponents. Apparently Mr. Maduro has decided that if inflation cannot be contained, Mr. Capriles and his allies will be.

To read this article at Wall Street Journal, please click here.

 
Aug
12
2013
Posted by
admin
Comments

ICYMI: Venezuela Opposition Comes Under Siege

Wall Street Journal
August 9, 2013
By José de Córdoba and Ezequiel Minaya

Oscar Lopez left adviser 010 ICYMI: Venezuela Opposition Comes Under Siege

Courtesy of: Associated Press

CARACAS—Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro, the political heir to late populist Hugo Chávez, is ratcheting up intimidation of his political foes as his government prepares for key municipal elections amid a deteriorating economy.

Oscar López, a senior aide to former opposition presidential candidate Henrique Capriles, was in hiding Friday after a government legislator said a warrant had been issued for the aide’s arrest. Days earlier, the apartment of Mr. López, Mr. Capriles’s chief of staff, was searched by military-intelligence agents, according to opposition officials.

“He doesn’t know what this circus is all about so he is taking care of himself” by going into hiding, said Julio Borges, a legislator and national coordinator of Venezuela’s leading opposition party, Justice First.

Mr. Capriles himself faces possible arrest after the Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected his challenge to Venezuela’s April presidential election, which Mr. Maduro won by a sliver but which was marred by allegations of fraud. The court went on to fine Mr. Capriles $1,700 for what it said was a “disrespectful” filing and said the opposition leader should be prosecuted for trying to undermine the election.

“It’s a way to attack Henrique and his movement,” Mr. Borges said.

A senior U.S. official said Washington is worried about developments in Venezuela. “The Venezuelan government is increasingly taking legal actions against the opposition, a development the United States finds profoundly worrying,” the official said. The wave of actions against opposition leaders like Mr. Capriles “raises legitimate and urgent concerns,” the official said.

Venezuela’s Attorney General’s Office declined to comment as did Venezuela’s Information Ministry.

Venezuelans go to the polls in December to contest some 335 mayors’ posts throughout the country, as well as hundreds of other local offices. The elections will be the first gauge of Mr. Maduro’s popularity since his win in April’s election.

In the run-up to the vote, Venezuela’s economy has shown signs of increasing stress after years of ramped-up public spending under Mr. Chávez, who died in March. The country’s inflation is north of 42%, common consumer goods like toilet paper are scarce, and despite high oil prices, Venezuela just defaulted on the payment of a $100 million bond of a nationalized steel company, spooking bond buyers. Divisions in the Chavista movement, nominally led by Mr. Maduro, are deep.

“This is clearly a wounded government as far as its mandate and its internal dynamics. And like any wounded animal, it can be dangerous. It is taking very severe steps to consolidate power,” said Christopher Sabatini, senior director of policy at the Americas Society and Council of the Americas.

Also this week, authorities jailed and froze the assets of the editor of a small independent paper and website, Leocenis García of Sexto Poder, who has published detailed reports of alleged government corruption. On Thursday, a judge fined two opposition newspapers—including El Nacional, the country’s most influential daily—1% of their 2009 income for showing a photograph of deteriorated conditions in a morgue. The judge said showing the photo was harmful to the welfare of children.

In Caracas, Juan Carlos Zapata, an author and political analyst, said the escalating repression shows a clear government intention to frighten the opposition. “They want to dismantle the opposition, they want Capriles’s aides to flee the country, and for Capriles to throw in the towel before elections,” said Mr. Zapata. “It’s an orchestrated plan to scare off the opposition.”

The Maduro government has said that it is simply rooting out corruption, regardless of political affiliation. Soon after taking office, Mr. Maduro launched an antigraft initiative that has resulted in the arrest of a handful of mid-level state officials.

The latest government moves follow last week’s stripping of parliamentary immunity by government deputies of a popular opposition congressman, by less than the constitutionally required two-thirds majority. Richard Mardo, who has built up a large following in the Chavista state of Aragua, now must face charges of alleged corruption.

Legal moves by the government against its foes are common in Venezuela. A study by Human Rights Watch found that as of May 2012, Venezuela’s Comptroller General’s Office had temporarily disqualified some 800 people, most of them Chávez foes, from running for office due to accusations of corruption—even though charges hadn’t been filed against them. About 300 people are still barred from running for office.

During his time in office Mr. Chavez routinely brushed aside international criticism as attempts to meddle with domestic affairs and plots to topple his government.

Meanwhile, the opposition is struggling to get out its message to ordinary Venezuelans. Globovisión, once a feisty opposition TV channel—and the only one that gave Mr. Capriles significant airtime—was sold earlier this year, and its coverage of Mr. Capriles has fallen sharply. News about Mr. Capriles is now relegated to a recently opened Web channel dubbed “Capriles TV.” Mr. Borges said that the opposition would have to work hard to get its message out by taking a “grass-roots” approach.

Opposition figures as well as analysts say the repressive wave points to the deep divisions in Mr. Chávez’s movement following his death. “Chávez was a kind of crazy glue that was able to keep different elements together,” says Mr. Borges.

Mr. Borges sees different power groups within the government fighting for influence and control. Within these groups are groups of powerful businessmen and executives who control different sectors of the economy such as the state oil industry, food imports, and the country’s other basic industries. “There are no institutions anymore, just different clans balancing each other,” Mr. Borges said. “Maduro is not president of the country, he is the boss of one of these groups.”

Analysts foresee a difficult time ahead for Venezuela. “It’s a disaster in the making because nobody is in charge,” says Riordan Roett, the head of Latin American studies at Johns Hopkins University.

Many analysts believe the most powerful faction is led by Diosdado Cabello, the president of the National Assembly. Mr. Cabello, a burly and bull-necked former army lieutenant who took part in Mr. Chávez’s failed 1992 coup, has close ties to the country’s armed forces and has reportedly built up a considerable personal fortune.

In late April, Mr. Cabello presided over the congress as a number of opposition legislators were beaten in the congressional chamber. At the time, Mr. Cabello didn’t allow opposition deputies to take the floor to speak until they recognized Mr. Maduro’s victory. Mr. Cabello has ruled the chamber with an iron fist ever since.

Javier Corrales, an expert on Venezuelan politics at Amherst College says that while Mr. Maduro has shown some signs of moderation—such as meeting with top businessmen, Mr. Cabello is openly confrontational. “This crackdown seems to come from Diosdado,” he said. “His instinct appears to be brute force.”

Mr. Cabello couldn’t be reached to comment.

To read this article at the Wall Street Journal, please click here.

 
Apr
29
2013
Posted by
admin
Comments

ICYMI: US Filmmaker Held in Venezuela Sought to Show Political Divide, Friends Say

The New York Times
April 26, 2013
By María Eugenia Díaz and William Neuman

venezuela popup e1367259291482 ICYMI: US Filmmaker Held in Venezuela Sought to Show Political Divide, Friends Say

Courtesy of: Associated Press

CARACAS, Venezuela — Just a few weeks ago, Tim Tracy spoke of his time shooting a documentary in Venezuela as a rollicking adventure and a filmmaker’s dream. Now he is under arrest, accused by the Venezuelan government of a different kind of adventure: taking part in what officials here said was a plot to destabilize the country and incite a civil war.

The government said Friday that Mr. Tracy, an American citizen, would be charged with involvement in acts of violence after the April 14 presidential election. Mr. Tracy was arrested by the intelligence police on Wednesday at the international airport near Caracas as he was about to leave the country, the government said.

Mr. Tracy was originally identified in a report released by Venezuela’s Information Ministry as Timothy Hallett. Hallett is his middle name.

Interior Minister Miguel Rodríguez said Thursday that Mr. Tracy had training as a spy and was part of a conspiracy to set off a civil war.

But those who knew Mr. Tracy in Caracas and in the United States, including in Los Angeles, where he lived, described him as an innocent — or perhaps naïve — filmmaker who had sought to portray Venezuela’s bitter political divide, not take sides in it.

Mr. Tracy spent time with both opposition student protesters and hard-core supporters of former President Hugo Chávez “to show the two sides of the story he was filming,” said Tuki Jencquel, a Venezuelan filmmaker who became friends with Mr. Tracy.

“He always seemed to be very evenhanded in his work and neutral in relation to what was happening in Venezuela,” he said. “I don’t think there’s anything subversive about that.”

In a conversation with a New York Times reporter about a week after the March 5 death of Mr. Chávez, Mr. Tracy spoke enthusiastically about the months he had spent working on his film.

And he described himself as one of the most unlikely people to do so: an American with rudimentary Spanish who started out with virtually no knowledge of Venezuela or its politics. He seemed like a man on a lark.

Mr. Tracy said that he had made friends in one of the most pro-Chávez slums in Caracas, an area known as 23 de Enero, and in particular with a man who appeared often at rallies dressed up as the revolutionary Ché Guevara. He marveled at how he had won the man’s confidence, despite the government’s anti-American stance.

But he also sounded a note of concern, saying that the ersatz Ché stopped talking to him after Mr. Chávez’s death. The government expelled two military attachés from the American Embassy on the day Mr. Chávez died, claiming that they were trying to destabilize the country. Mr. Tracy said he wondered if the man had taken the government propaganda to heart and regretted their friendship.

He said he had also filmed opponents of the government, but he seemed most enthusiastic about his ability to break through the apparent barriers and get close to Chávez loyalists.

Mr. Jencquel said that Mr. Tracy had been detained twice before for filming, once at a Chávez rally and once at the presidential palace in Caracas. On Friday, after being allowed to visit Mr. Tracy, Mr. Jencquel said his friend told him he was innocent.

Mr. Tracy, 35, identified himself on LinkedIn, a professional networking Web site, as a director and producer who had been involved in a television series that appeared on the History Channel and a movie. He attended Georgetown University.

Mr. Rodríguez, the interior minister, said that Mr. Tracy had funneled money to student protesters who the government claimed were connected to postelection violence.

But student groups said on Friday that they had not received money from Mr. Tracy, and they denied involvement in violence. “It seems to me like a big farce on the part of the government to distract attention,” said Gaby Arellano, 26, who has taken part in the protests. She said that Mr. Tracy had interviewed her about her reasons for protesting.

Tensions in Venezuela have increased in the wake of the election, which Nicolás Maduro, Mr. Chávez’s heir, won by less than 2 percent. His opponent, Henrique Capriles Radonski, claims that Mr. Maduro stole the election, and he has demanded a recount.

After the election, Mr. Capriles urged his supporters to protest by marching in the streets and banging pots at home at night.

The government responded by claiming that Mr. Capriles was seeking to foment violence. It pointed to several people who were killed the day after the election, saying they were Maduro supporters murdered by members of the opposition.

But it has provided little hard evidence to back up the claims that the deaths were politically motivated. In one case, the father of a man who was shot dead said that his son was killed while taking part in a protest against Mr. Maduro’s victory, contradicting the government’s account.

It is typical of the government here to sometimes make wild claims about conspiracies without providing evidence. During the campaign, Mr. Maduro repeatedly warned of plots to kill him, and he said that foreign agents were entering the country to undermine the government.

In all of this, Mr. Maduro is sticking to the playbook of Mr. Chávez, who regularly warned of threats from the United States or suspected homegrown traitors.

Mr. Maduro has sent mixed signals in recent weeks about whether he hopes to improve his country’s rocky relationship with the United States, which is a major buyer of Venezuelan oil.

“We hope that many of these conspiracies and interventions by sectors of the C.I.A. and the Pentagon can finally be put behind us and we can have a relation with President Obama based on respect,” he said Thursday.

Patrick Ventrell, a State Department spokesman, said Friday that Mr. Tracy had no ties to any government agency. “The U.S. continues to categorically reject any allegations of U.S. government efforts to destabilize the Venezuelan government,” Mr. Ventrell said.

In a statement released Friday, Mr. Tracy’s parents said, “We believe a mistake has been made with the detention of our son Timothy by the Venezuelan authorities.”

To read this article at The New York Times, please click here.